Mid-Size
You've hired a first architect, inherited an SI's implementation, and outgrown the way changes get made. Laminar runs the whole chain on one platform with senior Fellows inside your team, so the capability you're building compounds instead of walking out the door.
100+ enterprise teams trust Laminar with the systems that run their business.
Proof at scale
Platform figures, each linked to its source. Nothing here is rounded up.
Where it breaks
The implementation closed on a milestone, the invoice was paid, and the handover was a deck. Your team is now responsible for flows it didn't write and can't fully read.
One person understands the org, and every change waits on them. They're also the one who'd leave if the job stayed like this.
Deploys happen quarterly because they're risky, and they're risky because they happen quarterly. Every release day is a war room.
Everyone knows the org carries dead flows, duplicate fields, and permission sets from three reorgs. Nobody has the evidence to say which to fix first.
Every proposal begins with a discovery phase and ends with a re-implementation. What you want is someone to work on what's there.
There's a change-management policy in a wiki and no mechanism that enforces it. The audit trail is a Slack search.
How it runs
Profile reads the org and produces the ranked roadmap your architect has been asking for; Flow ships it with senior Fellows alongside your team, deploy by deploy, under Ascent's gates. The team that did the work stays on for managed services, and the measure of success is how little you need us next year.
The platform
Shift reads the process, Profile reads the org, and Flow does the work. Ascent holds every change, from every engine, to the same rules.
Fellows
8,000+ vetted operators who've spent careers making enterprise systems hold, working inside your team from kickoff through go-live and after. They measure success by how little you need them next year.
Every figure here was measured with the customer and is footnoted to its source. Nothing is rounded up.
Security
Access, change, and deployment events are recorded as they happen, in append-only stores. Controls you can show an auditor, not describe to one.
Deny-by-default sandbox egress, short-lived tokens, and credentials brokered outside the box. The information-security mechanisms exist before the certificate does.
The agent works in an isolated sandbox on the work item's own branch, and a named person approves what ships. How the AI is governed, in writing.
Data stays where your org keeps it. Access resolves to named users, and retention is something Profile can show you rather than guess at.
Changes to systems holding PHI clear the same gates as every other change, with approvals and deployments recorded as they happen.
The alternatives
Mid-size teams usually pick between adding headcount, signing another SI, or buying DevOps tooling and hoping. Here's what each one leaves you with.
