Enterprise
Advisory, assessment, implementation, and managed services usually come from four firms, each starting over, none responsible for what happens next. Laminar runs all four on one platform under one MSA, with approval gates, blocking checks, and an audit record written with every change.
100+ enterprise teams trust Laminar with the systems that run their business.
Proof at scale
Platform figures across every engagement, each linked to its source. Nothing here is rounded up.
Where it breaks
Advisory hands a deck to assessment, assessment hands findings to implementation, implementation hands a system to managed services. Each firm starts over, and you pay for the relearning.
The SI model profits from the problem. The senior people sell the work; the people doing it are learning on your org.
The milestone is met, the SOW closes, and nobody on the account is responsible for what happens next. Knowledge stays tribal and documentation never gets written.
Each firm brings its own tooling, its own release process, and its own idea of an audit trail. The CoE spends its time reconciling them.
Every vendor now offers an AI agent. An agent without your org's history is a new hire on day one, unsupervised, in production.
Who changed the order flow in March, under whose approval, against which org? The answer exists in four systems and three inboxes, and takes a week to assemble.
How it runs
Shift and Profile produce the map and the findings in the first weeks; Flow ships the roadmap with senior Fellows inside your CoE, every deploy clearing Ascent's gates and landing on the record. The same team runs managed services, priced on outcomes, and your CoE owns the platform, the record, and the capability.
The platform
Shift reads the process, Profile reads the org, and Flow does the work. Ascent holds every change, from every engine, to the same rules.
Fellows
8,000+ vetted operators who've spent careers making enterprise systems hold, working inside your team from kickoff through go-live and after. They measure success by how little you need them next year.
Every figure here was measured with the customer and is footnoted to its source. Nothing is rounded up.
Security
Access, change, and deployment events are recorded as they happen, in append-only stores. Controls you can show an auditor, not describe to one.
Deny-by-default sandbox egress, short-lived tokens, and credentials brokered outside the box. The information-security mechanisms exist before the certificate does.
The agent works in an isolated sandbox on the work item's own branch, and a named person approves what ships. How the AI is governed, in writing.
Data stays where your org keeps it. Access resolves to named users, and retention is something Profile can show you rather than guess at.
Changes to systems holding PHI clear the same gates as every other change, with approvals and deployments recorded as they happen.
The alternatives
Enterprises usually pick between a chain of specialists, one large SI, or carrying everything in-house. Here's what each one leaves you with.
