Profile
Profile scans your org's metadata, limits, logs, storage, and access, and turns what it finds into a prioritized list of issues. Every finding links to the class, flow, or object it came from.
100+ enterprise teams trust Laminar with the systems that run their business.
The problem
A typical enterprise org has around 24,000 metadata components and thousands of security issues, and the people who built it have often moved on. Every change is made without a full picture of what it might affect.
How it works
Profile reads your org and captures a point-in-time snapshot of it. Each finding links to the object, class, or flow it came from, and findings roll up into a prioritized 30/60/90-day roadmap.
Forensics
Errors and failures that show up as support tickets, traced back to the component causing them.
Forensics
Errors and failures that show up as support tickets, traced back to the component causing them.
Which trigger, which flow, and how much of the total.
Observed and configured races, named, counted, no longer intermittent.
Acceptance criteria measured after the fix lands, projected against realized.
Set cost, reliability and AI-readiness; findings re-rank against it.
Objects approaching their field limits, before the next project hits.
Storage and licenses
Profile ties storage and license costs to the objects and people actually using them.
Storage and licenses
Profile ties storage and license costs to the objects and people actually using them.
Storage and license cleanup in phases, each with an owner.
Records no process has read in months, ranked by payback.
Seats, cost, and waste per license, ahead of each renewal.
Seats assigned, seats used, and the gap between them.
Who can actually see and edit what, resolved to people.
Dependency graph
Profile maps how every component connects, so you can assess the impact of a change before you build it.
Dependency graph
Profile maps how every component connects, so you can assess the impact of a change before you build it.
Every object, field, class, flow and layout, and its dependencies.
One hop out from any component: what a change reaches.
Each org and sandbox scored, with the evidence behind it.
Each scan is saved as-is, so you can compare your org across releases.
Turn any finding into a work item, with its evidence attached.
Why Profile
Other options give you less detail, or hand you a slide deck. Profile gives you evidence you can act on.
I really love the dependency graph. These are your dependencies. When X thing happens, these are all the places where it's impacting. I love the graph.
After we ran it for our org, one thing I loved about it is its business-oriented results. For active flows, Laminar goes beyond to say, okay, it's not only active but it's not being executed. I think it takes it to another level and shows the context of which business process, which ones we can potentially deprecate, and I could really work with the business stakeholders with that information.
I love that graph where it shows contractually how much we have per license, what the baseline is. We're already putting it into our backlog: how do we get lower in terms of our storage footprint without it being a problem?
Where Profile fits
Shift shows where your process slows down. Profile shows what in your system is causing it. Flow builds and ships the fix, and Ascent makes sure every change passes the same checks.
